Traffic camera alert – corporate law enforcement
March 1st, 2010 | by admin |
To learn more about camera fraud visit:
http://www.youtube.com/user/RP4409
UK: Speed Cameras Triple
http://blog.puppetgov.com/2009/02/03/uk-speed-cameras-triple/
Speed cameras will be able to track drivers for miles
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/3163410/Speed-cameras-will-be-able-to-track-drivers-for-miles.html
UK terror law to make photographing police illegal
http://www.prisonplanet.com/uk-terror-law-to-make-photographing-police-illegal.html
Red-light camera Pickerington hearing set for Jan. 20
Arizona-based Redflex administers Columbus’ photo red-light enforcement program, which began in 2006. Redflex would install the cameras at no cost to the city, but would take about 50 percent of the revenues generated by fines.
http://www.thisweeknews.com/live/content/pickerington/stories/2009/01/07/0108pkredlightcamera_ln.html?type=rss&cat=&sid=104
Duncanville council member wants to re-evaluate red-light camera policy
Duncanville, Texas a suburb of Dallas has a population of 38,500 and in 2008 nearly 45,000 red light citations were issued in 2008 at four intersections monitored by these cameras.
The majority of the tickets were not for speeding through a red light or rolling through the light on a right-hand turn. They were for failing to stop at the white line set back from the crosswalk.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/020309dnmeduncameras.38f22d7.html
Maryland Students Use Speed Cameras For Revenge
A speed camera is located out in front of Wootton High School, providing a convenient location for generating the false tickets. Instead of purchasing license plates, students have ready access to laser printers that can create duplicate license plates using glossy paper using readily available fonts.
http://www.thesentinel.com/302730670790449.php
As the economic crisis worsens and municipalities become further squeezed for funds these private run traffic cameras will be increasingly used to raise revenue. Paul Turner
Redflex Traffic Systems Pty. Ltd Austr
http://www.redflex.com/html/global/index.php
American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
http://www.atsol.com/
Cameras may nab speeders in construction zones
Friday, February 13, 2009 10:38 PM
By James Nash
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH
By next year, driving through construction zones might give you something to watch out for other than concrete barriers, orange cones and work crews.
Soon, speed-triggered cameras might be peering at motorists and their license plates.
The Ohio Department of Public Safety this week briefed lawmakers on its proposal to install cameras in construction zones that would photograph speeders’ license plates. Tickets would be mailed to the registered owners’ homes.
Although public-safety officials introduced the idea as part of discussions on the state budget, they insisted yesterday that safety – not money – is the catalyst. First-time offenders in Illinois are fined $375.
Chicago red-light cameras could snare uninsured drivers
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-cameras-insurance-scofflawsmar17,0,936367.story
It is the similarities of the two parties and not the perceived differences which are bankrupting the United States. Whether Democrat or Republican, defense spending will increase. Whether Democrat or Republican, the size of the federal government will increase. Whether Democrat or Republican, multi-national corporate interests will dominate over the common good of man. Whether Democrat or Republican, citizens will continue to lose more freedom and liberty.
It is important to keep in mind the “divide and conquer” strategy. The transfer of the wealth upwards is a non-denominational effort.
Duration : 0:3:59
25 Responses to “Traffic camera alert – corporate law enforcement”
By BourneAccident on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
I have heard of …
I have heard of some people breaking these cameras. I don’t know how they do it, but they get revenge I guess.
By universalknac on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
I see alot of …
I see alot of street signs (especially in the turning lanes) that are bombarded with bumper stickers. Whoever these sticker vandals are…do us all a favor and stick them on the camera lenses…problem solved! You think law enforcement would put cameras to film/protect the street cams?? nah, we have stickers for those too.
By lopytube on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
that is F@#4 up …
that is F@#4 up beyond belief.
You dont know what I would do if I had a ladder…
how many of you guys out there would give these cameras a lesson if you had the proper team with you.
By hollywoodartchick on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
People rush to get …
People rush to get into intersections before the camera goes off. the company that the city holds the contract with only wanted to put its lights up at intersections where they could maximize profits. They assumed, if 40 cars ran a red/day, they would KEEP getting 40 citations/day. Once drivers noticed what was going on, it dropped to, say 5. But the company had contracts for the amount 40 citations/day would yield. So the price of tickets went UP to compensate for less tickets! $400!!!
By aaronlovespot on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
car
car
By aaronlovespot on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
the red light cams …
the red light cams do more than you think . for one thing they track and trace every can that passes by it. and you will find a tracker box every 2 blocks or less .
By wilsonpwt on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
Keep in mind, many …
Keep in mind, many corporations and governments either maintain their own print and Internet Reputation Management gurus, or hire someone to do so. This IRM can cost millions, and there are a lot of people who are paid to post disinformation without having a real opinion of their own. It is a form of spam, but insidious, since these people don’t have to identify themselves as paid IRM posters.
Check out my video, “To Tell The Truth About SHILLS”.
By chechnya on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
Red light cameras …
Red light cameras are great. The city here installed them about a year or so ago and they’ve worked out well. They actually made the yellow light a second longer.
By TexanCyclist on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
Funny how …
Funny how supporters all seem to feel their lives are above reproach when the objective of the police state is to ensure compliance even as laws become ever more restrictive & freedoms ever more scarce.
By TexanCyclist on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
I have an infra-red …
I have an infra-red cam that can record through your flimsy walls. Still not concerned? Not saying I will, but I can.
By WoodzEntertainment09 on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
i couldnt agree more
i couldnt agree more
By WoodzEntertainment09 on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
A lot of the …
A lot of the Federal appropriated spending funds will be spent on appropriating more funds from the average citizen.
By vannahsmommy on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
We have red light …
We have red light cameras in my town, and they don’t even give us the courtesy of posting signs to let us know! They’re just sitting up there waiting for you to mess up. Talk about a police state!!
By RodneyHampton on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
Paul, this is an …
Paul, this is an excellent video. This isn’t about public safety. This is about revenue and control. Some brits have thrown old tires over some of the cameras and burned them. Seems an old tire will burn pretty hot for quite a while.
By Revgirl5 on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
very informative… …
very informative…thanks for the vid!
By wilsonpwt on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
To kcolumbusgirl: …
To kcolumbusgirl: Concerning the issue of, “When you are IN PUBLIC you HAVE no PRIVACY.”, shouldn’t this be a two-way street? New laws set to be passed in England and Canada would make it illegal to take photographs of police officers, moving us further away from the idea of police as public servants. I put a link in my sidebar if you want to know more.
By wilsonpwt on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
kcolumbusgirl …
kcolumbusgirl doesn’t yet realize the loss of freedoms and liberties already imposed on all of us.
By admiralcrash1 on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
Exactly.
Exactly.
By wilsonpwt on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
The use of traffic …
The use of traffic enforcement cameras has tripled in the United Kingdom between 2001 and 2007. There are growing numbers of UK citizens who at one time supported these cameras that are now actively fighting against them. Redflex and ATS are a private enterprise and a lot of the funds raised goes to them. Do we really want corporate interests enforcing our laws?
By mlang52 on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
I don’t know about …
I don’t know about that! I think she is just too perfect to be bothered by anyone, who might accidentally break the law. You know. Like, no one should ever get a break! It is a little authoritarian for me. I don’t need a nanny or another mother, thank you very much! And I think my comments should viewed to be just the opposite of supportive. I don’t believe in breaking the law. I just don’t believe in unjust laws or excessive intrusion. Don’t like the violators. Not worth a fine, though.
By Isawanangel1X on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
damn how much is …
how much is this gonna cost!! and is the revenue worth it!! whose got this contract, for pete’s sake, more patronage, war on you
By admiralcrash1 on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
The point went …
The point went flying over your head shortee. i gues the best thing for you is to keep doing what Lemmings do.
By kcolumbusgirl on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
Well as a …
Well as a libertarian I would think that you would be supportive of people breaking the law (since those lines are there SPECIFICALLY to tell you where to stop) being fined and that money being used to support the city, as opposed to people having to pay more in taxes for OTHER people’s mistakes…
By kcolumbusgirl on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
Feel free. I would, …
Feel free. I would, however, have the ability to publicize what you did, and most likely learn to keep my curtains shut. – anyone with any common sense knows that if someone can SEE in your house, they can FILM in your house as well…
By admiralcrash1 on Mar 1, 2010 | Reply
I think I’m going …
I think I’m going to start taking some camera out. This is crap.