I need expert advice on relativity and neutrino.?
January 19th, 2012 | by admin |The day they published the OPERA experiment, I slept at 2:00 am, and I had an idea, please read it and if you are an expert in special relativity, give me your opinion:
SOLUTION FOR NEUTRINO PARADOX
With the recent experiment conducted at CERN, we are about to ensure that the speed of the neutrino is greater than that of light, which apparently contradicts radically the current theoretical framework based on the Lorentz factor, conceptualized by Einstein for Special Theory of Relativity.
But I propose a universal Lorentz factor, where the denominator of the square root is not C (speed of light), but U (variable universal), but of course, the observer would perceive A and B particles U electromagnetic waves or photons not speed C (such as radars, cameras, the human eye, interferometers etc.), but it would have devices that capture particles or, in the case of neutrinos, neutrino detectors would. And if in these conditions we make the Michelson-Morley experiment, then the neutrino velocityconstant would be independent from the inertial observer’s perspective it would no longer constant C for observers in mind that the speed according to the neutrino experiments at CERN travel faster than light, thus, when we calculate the Lorentz factor with C Superior speed, we are not dealing with an imaginary number, if not a positive root, since the speed of the particle would not be greater than the speed of neutrino. ( IN THIS HYPOTHETICAL EXPERIMENT INFORMATION TRAVEL WITH PHOTONS, NOT WITH LIGHT)
Relativistic implications of this approach are of great importance since the variation of time, mass and space dropped by Lorentz transformations would have no way limited to the speed of light but that of the neutrino in this case.
The answer I propose in this brief article is so simple that has been expressed in two paragraph’s, but its implications are very important in these times when the scientific community found no answer to the new discovery of the neutrino velocity.
The Castilian video has received over 5000 visits, called NEUTRINOS VERSUS LUZ, EINSTEIN NO SE EQUIVOCO
Here is what physicists say about superluminal neutrinos:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3888
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1574
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0785
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0093
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6697
… and about 100 more
With this as the first, that started it all (updated to recent).
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897v2
5 Responses to “I need expert advice on relativity and neutrino.?”
By OldPilot on Jan 19, 2012 | Reply
Neutrinos and FTL
Note the word "suggests" in the news report. Translation: We are not sure, yet.
I doubt the result (It is yet to be confirmed by other observers) and suspect some quantum effect. In any case, the real test will be can neutrinos be modulated to send information at greater than light speed. If not, I suspect it will join quantum entanglement as a FTL quantum effect that cannot carry information and thus special relativity will remain just barely safe.
I remember Cold Fusion
The CERN observation is not confirmed. Also, a very small experimental error would invalidate the result. I remember Cold Fusion where a well known and respected scientist got results that later proved to be false
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/09/scientists-question-neutrinos/
http://physicsforme.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/superluminal-neutrinos-from-string-theory/
And you don’t do the exact same experiment over. You do something different that tests the same physical phenomena. (Einstein: Insanity is doing the same thing over and expecting a different result.)
The M-Theory/String Theory guys think it is a quantum effect that relies on the additional dimensions of M-Theory. If that is the case, special relativity need only be tweaked to say that the Speed of Light is the maximum for things that exist in the 4D macro universe
References :
By Joe S on Jan 19, 2012 | Reply
If you don’t know that "paragraph’s" doesn’t require an apostrophe, I don’t really need to read the rest of your opinion on the faster-than-light neutrino problem.
References :
By Godsproblemchild on Jan 19, 2012 | Reply
Its going to be very inconvenient to loose the speed of light as a constant.
But once the existing house of cards is cleared away the new science will be better.
References :
By David Espinal on Jan 19, 2012 | Reply
What he says is that if the information travels with the neutrino then the speed of light is not constant but if the neutrino, but if the information travels with the photon, C will remain constant . Is an interesting concept but need to be reviewed by experts
References :
By OzoneGuy on Jan 19, 2012 | Reply
Here is what physicists say about superluminal neutrinos:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3888
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1574
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0785
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0093
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6697
… and about 100 more
With this as the first, that started it all (updated to recent).
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897v2
References :